The Ultimate Path to Absolute Digital Security

Code Translator Software

The code translator will be defined as a compiler, interpreter or any entity that generates computer instructions. The code translator implements a set of abstract rules through granular operations that convert code to machine or intermediate instructions. These granular operations can be extended for the sole purpose of reporting on activities based on a different set of rules. The set of rules would be aimed at producing a report of code activities instead of computer instructions. These activities must constitute a scope that completely embodies what is possible for all malicious digital operations. The activities will be defined as system resources engaged through code. The translator would take adavantage of a capacity to detect operating system calls that engage hardware, memory and file system resources. The set of rules for such detection will be explained in another section. This section is dedicated to activities of the code translator related to those rules.

A code translator is the point of origin that can detect activities related to code and data. We defined code as a resource that contains any type of computer instructions. We must take an effective approach in clarifying our expectations of this resource. A wrong approach can lead to inadequate protection or overprotection that incorrectly identifies useful code as malicious. Rather than quantify the characteristics of harmless code, we should pinpoint or detect all software operations that can be harmful. This detection should occur at a certain stage of software creation. Only the compiler, interpreter and similar code processors are appropriate for this responsibility. Every software operation originates from code that must be processed by a translator. The translator is fully aware of code details. We can exploit this fact to generate a report of system resources engaged by the code.

Code Translator Software

All malicious code operations do not go beyond engaging file or other system resources. The translator should generate a Secure Engaged System Resources (SESR, pronounced Say-Zar) report. The details of this report and how it should be generated by a translator will be provided later. We will also explain how malicious engagement of system resources can be distinguished. The report would state all reading, writing, creation and updates related to system resource engagements. A software interface (like APSCCS) should encrypt this report to produce a SESR signature and security key. These pieces of data would be unique to each report. The report should also include features that can protect it from piracy. Therefore, safe code begins with including a SESR report. We will later elaborate on how this condition can be established.

The creation of a SESR report can be seemlesly coherent with default operations of a code translator. This goal can be achieved in two stages that culminate in a report. The first stage involves saving data related to a normal translation process. This stage reflects the primary goal of a translator to generate instructions. The saved elements would be separated as system calls, memory locations (or references) and devices. The translator would retrieve such data specific to an operating system and CPU. These three elements would be retireved at the instant they can be correctly identified. The translator may also create a header that contains information specific to a programming language (such as entry points and function access levels). The three elements would be linked to this header. This saved information provides raw material for the next stage. The software that hosts a code translator should cater to stage two.

The complete material

of this site

is available as an eBook

from these sellers.

Previous Next